Quote:
|
.Eectrolysis is not the only way to snythesise pott or sod chlorate.
|
Who said it is? We're talking in context here, you're going far out of context. The OP has no real chemistry or pyrotechnics experience and asked if he could make an explosive out of bleach and table salt- you offer him electrolysis to create just an oxidiser. Did he ask for just an oxidiser? No. Did he even know what electrolysis meant until now? Probably not. So show me some research proving salt and bleach combined makes a ready to use explosive, otherwise most of your argument is invalid.
Quote:
|
.I hesitated to post such asinine subjects as an IQ test but the constant belittlement by a pyrotechnician who has by his own admission made NO HEs has no clue how simple some of these nitrations are.
|
Because you have to do something to know it doesn't work, right? Because you've done this and provided evidence that you have, right? You are on no grounds to start stating qualifications, boy, considering that you aren't exactly crystal clear on your abilities. If you REALLY want to, I'll bring in my chemist buddies to show you how impractical your advise is to the OP who doesn't even have a workshop.
Speaking of which, you probably still use your kitchen stove as a bunsen burner.
Quote:
|
there is a individual in fed jail as we speak, (Sherman Austin)1 of his charges posting explosives synthesis.(2007 law instigated by Diane Fienstien)
|
Great excuse there, even though the 38,060 members APC and RogueSci haven't been arrested, law enforcement agencies would make a special exception for you and search through the 12,351 members of this site to get issued a search warrant for your house.
Quote from wikipedia:
"a United States federal law which makes the distribution of information on explosives unlawful if the information is provided with the knowledge or intent that the information will be used to commit a violent federal crime"
Seeing as the OP didn't say he wanted this information to blow up the Pentagon, your fears of police interference are ill founded. So stop making things up and start providing facts and proof. Austin also owned an Anarchist website and distributed information on a daily basis to other anti-government officials, that makes him a threat to national security. I highly doubt that a moron like you is to be considered a threat to national security.
Quote:
|
In a dream or perhaps my dead friend has synthesised AP,MEKP,picric acid ,Fulminate of mercury,and made a binary exlosive when the materials were readily available as well as made electric and fused single primary and composite caps.Other practical and successful experiments were line charges, platter charges and some fun with fishing AN/MEKP 14ml mekp/100gr AN
|
Seeing as it's a dream or a dead friend made it your post is irrelevant. Until you provide images of
AT LEAST your workshop, some glassware, maybe some chemicals and even a video of your results then I won't take you seriously.
Quote:
|
Purely personal motives but Id like to see a bit more research than personality bashing
|
Give me the tome and I'll chop it up. You've given me none, so I chopped you up.
Quote:
I would spoon feed the naysayers with a printout of various synthesis but I havent the means and posting links didnt work for me?Besides why do i need to spoonfeed the "experts"?
One of whom has no nitrations under his belt and is a firecracker maker?
|
Why should I trust a drop-out who admittedly basis his self esteem off his IQ (which isn't that high) when he knows that it's a flawed indicator of potential. Also, get it right, I'm a firework maker, not firecracker maker. Just because I rely on my star pump instead of the test tube, doesn't mean I can't play game if you handed me a set of glassware.
Quote:
|
PS;vocabulary is a very good indication of intelligence,"bitch"
|
PS: "PS" stands for "Post-script", using a semi colon is an example of poor punctuation. Vocabulary is a very good indication that the person knows a few extra words, seeing as yours doesn't supersede mine you don't have any real grounds for saying you're the least bit intelligent. More advanced concepts such as correct paragraphing and consistently flawless English are regarded as signs of intelligence. More importantly, having high analytical skill an ability is the highest sign of intelligence in my books, but seeing as you can't even explain yourself without making at least 10 mistakes I don't think it's even worth trying to gauge how smart you are.
Keep whimpering like an injured dog, oh BTW, that was a really poor attempt by signing up as "Timm".