I know I'm double posting but I'd rather start a new post for the new day to give things a timeline.
There was another stipulation in my "Pseudo-Moderation" thread people seem to have overlooked;
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by headcase Same goes for useless posts, inaccurate anecdotes and opinion without arguement. |
Admittedly that doesn't stand if you're claim in obvious and widely accepted (no need to reference your claim that the sky is blue) but a good example of what
not to do would be;
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pimpin4life30  Im not saying forget the Holocaust even though the U.S. government staged that... |
... so Pimpin4life30 has been banned for a week.
On a lighter note, when we ban a member we usually enter a reason why that the member can see next time they log on. For Pimpin, I said "either back up your stupid claims or don't make stupid claims". When Random banned AnarchyIsKing, he said "you were told to show supporting evidence - you failed". When banning CrazyGoth666, xpl0siv said "fuck off". Good point, well made.