Go Back   Bombshock Forums > Thoughts > Law, Order, War and Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Analysis: Mumbai attack differs from past terror strikes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 10:38 AM
Draven's Avatar
Draven Draven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 0
Draven is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Analysis: Mumbai attack differs from past terror strikes

From: Analysis: Mumbai attack differs from past terror strikes - The Long War Journal
Analysis: Mumbai attack differs from past terror strikes
By Bill RoggioNovember 28, 2008 12:31 AM

Click image to view an interactive graphic showing the attacks in Mumbai. Created by The New York Times.

Almost two days after terrorists attacked the Indian financial hub of Mumbai, the Indian military is still working to root out the remnants of the assault teams at two hotels and a Jewish center. More than 125 people, including six foreigners, have been killed and 327 more have been wounded. The number is expected to go up, as Indian commandos have recovered an additional 30 dead at the Taj Mahal hotel as fighting has resumed.

The Mumbai attack is uniquely different from past terror strikes carried out by Islamic terrorists. Instead of one or more bombings at distinct sites, the Mumbai attackers struck throughout the city using military tactics. Instead of one or more bombings carried out over a short period of time, Mumbai is entering its third day of crisis.

An attack of this nature cannot be thrown together overnight. It requires planned, scouting, financing, training, and a support network to aid the fighters. Initial reports indicate the attacks originated from Pakistan, the hub of jihadi activity in South Asia. Few local terror groups have the capacity to pull of an attack such as this.

While it is early to know exactly what happened in Mumbai as the fog of war still blankets the city, multiple press reports from India allow for a general picture to be painted. An estimated 12 to 25 terrorists are believed to have entered Mumbai by sea. After landing, he attack teams initiated a battle at a police station, then fanned across the city to attack the soft underbelly of hotels, cafes, cinemas, and hospitals. Civilians were gunned down and taken hostage, while terrorists looked for people carrying foreign passports.

Preparation

While the exact size of the assault force and the support cells is still not known, police estimate about 25 gunmen were involved in the attack. The number of members of the supporting cells that provide financing, training, transportation, and other services could be two to four times this number. Operational security for such a large unit, or grouping of cells, is difficult to maintain and requires organization and discipline.

To pull off an attack of this magnitude, it requires months of training, planning, and on-site reconnaissance. Indian officials have stated that the terrorists set up "advance control rooms" at the Taj Mahal and Trident (Oberoi) hotels, and conducted a significant amount of reconnaissance prior to executing the attack. If the news about the "control rooms" is accurate, these rooms may also have served as weapons and ammunition caches for the assault teams to replenish after conducting the first half of the operation.


A terrorist outside the train station in Mumbai.

The planners of the Mumbai attack appear to have chosen able military-aged males. Witnesses have described the men as young and fit. Some of the gunmen appear to have been well trained; some have been credited with having good marksmanship and other military skills.

A witness who saw one of the teams land by sea described the gunmen as "in their 20s, fair-skinned and tall, clad in jeans and jackets." He saw "eight young men stepping out of the raft, two at a time. They jumped into the waters, and picked up a haversack. They bent down again, and came up carrying two more haversacks, one in each hand."

An Indian official claimed the attackers used "sophisticated weapons," however this may be an overstatement. Reports indicate the gunmen used automatic rifles, hand grenades, and some machineguns, as well as several car bombs. The terrorists did not have sophisticated weapons such as anti-aircraft missiles to attack helicopters supporting Indian counterterrorism forces.

Getting to Mumbai

One of the more intriguing aspects of the attack is how the teams entered Mumbai. Reports indicate at least two of the assault teams arrived from outside the city by sea around 9 p.m. local time. Indian officials believe most if not all of the attackers entered Mumbai via sea.

Indian Coast Guard, Navy, Mumbai maritime police, and customs units have scoured the waters off Mumbai in search of a "mother ship" that transported one or more smaller Gemini inflatable boats used by the attackers. A witness saw one of the craft land in Colaba in southern Mumbai and disgorge eight to 10 fighters.

Two ships that have been boarded are strongly suspected of being involved in the attacks: the Kuber, an Indian fishing boat, and the MV Alpha, a Vietnamese cargo ship. Both ships appear to have been directly involved. The Kuber was hijacked on Nov. 13, and its captain was found murdered. Four crewmen are reported to be still missing.

Indian security officials found what they believe is evidence linking the boat to the attack, as well as linking the attackers to Pakistan. "A GPS map of south Mumbai was found along with a satellite phone on the ship, Coast Guard officials confirmed," The Times of India reported. "There were reports that this phone was used to make calls to Karachi immediately before the shootings began in Mumbai."

Indian police also detained three terrorists from the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terror group closely allied with al Qaeda. The three men are said to be Pakistani nationals, and claimed to have been part of a 12-man team that launched from the MV Alpha. They said the MV Alpha departed from Karachi.

Another Indian official said that it is "suspected that the Pakistan Marine Agency helped the terrorists hijack the trawler (the Kuber)," although this has not been confirmed. Another unconfirmed report indicated the Kuber originated from Karachi, Pakistan.

The attack

After landing in Colaba, the terrorists moved north and attacked the Colaba police station, possibly as a single unit. The attack on the police command and control node disrupted the police response and pinned down police units.

The Mumbai police paid a heavy price. Early in the fight, the attackers killed the chief of Mumbai's Anti-terrorism Squad and two other senior officials. At least 14 police were reported to have been killed during fighting throughout the city.

From the Colaba police station, the assault force broke up into smaller teams and fanned out to hit secondary targets throughout Mumbai. At least one police van was hijacked and the terrorists drove around the city, firing automatic weapons from the truck at random targets.

In all, 10 locations, including the police station, were attacked. The assault teams struck at vital centers where foreigners were likely to congregate: the five-star Taj Mahal and Trident hotels, the Nariman House (an orthodox Jewish center), the Cama hospital, the CSP train station, a cinema, and a cafe were all struck almost simultaneously. Two Taxis were also blown up near the airport in the north and the docks in the southern part of the city.

At the Taj, Trident, and Nariman House, several bombs or hand grenades were tossed into the lobbies and in other areas. The Taj Mahal Hotel was set on fire due to the blasts.

Gunmen opened fire indiscriminately in the hotel lobbies and at the cafe, cinema, train station, and the Jewish center. At the hotels, gunmen then sought out foreigners holding American, British, and Israeli passports.

More than 200 hostages were reported to have been held at the Taj and scores more at the Trident and the Jewish center. Mumbai was under siege as police and counterterrorism officials struggled to regain control of the city.

The counterattack

Police appear to have regained control of the situation at the CSP train station, cafe, and cinema relatively quickly, however they were unable to handle the hostage situation at the hotels, the hospital, and the Jewish center. Police officials admitted they were “overwhelmed” by the attacks and unable to contain the fighting.

After a delay, more than 200 National Security Guards commandos and a number of elite Naval commandos, as well as an unknown number of Army forces were deployed to Mumbai. The hotels, the hospital, and the Jewish center were surrounded as the special operations forces prepared to assault the buildings.

Commandos are in the process of clearing the Taj and the Trident in room-by-room searches. Some of the rooms are reported to have been rigged with explosives. Several National Security Guards commandos have been reported to have been killed or wounded in the fighting. Indian forces are also storming the Jewish Center after air assaulting soldiers into the complex. Curiously, it does not appear the terrorists have executed hostages once they were taken.

At this time, police said seven terrorist have been killed and nine have been detained. Several more are still thought to be hiding in the Taj and Trident hotels, and the Jewish center.
__________________
You can kill the man but never the idea that fuels the man's thirst of vengence...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 10:57 AM
Draven's Avatar
Draven Draven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 0
Draven is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Indian Mujahideen claimed responsibility

In an e-mail to local news stations, a group called the Deccan Mujahideen, or Indian Mujahideen, has claimed responsibility for the Mumbai strike. While the Indian Mujahideen’s role in the attack has yet to be confirmed, at least two of the terrorists fighting in Mumbai indicated they were linked to Islamic terrorists.

One of the terrorists phoned a news station demanding jihadis be released from jail in exchange for prisoners. "We want all Mujahideens held in India released and only after that we will release the people," a man named Sahadullah told a media outlet. "Release all the Mujahideens, and Muslims living in India should not be troubled."

Another terrorist named Imran phoned a TV station and spoke in Urdu in what is believed to be a Kashmiri accent. "Ask the government to talk to us and we will release the hostages," he said. "Are you aware how many people have been killed in Kashmir? Are you aware how your army has killed Muslims? Are you aware how many of them have been killed in Kashmir this week?"

The Indian Mujahideen has taken credit for several recent mass-casualty attacks in India. The group claimed credit for the July 25 and 26 bombings in Ahmedabad and Bangalore. At least 36 Indians were killed and more than 120 were wounded in the attacks. The Indian Mujahideen took credit for the Sept. 13 attacks in New Delhi that resulted in 18 killed and more than 90 wounded. The group also claimed credit for the bombings in Jaipur last May (60 killed, more than 200 wounded), and bombings in Uttar Pradesh in November 2007 (14 killed, 50 wounded).

In several of those attacks, an Indian Mujahideen operative who calls himself Arbi Hindi e-mailed the media to claim responsibility. Arbi Hindi's real name is Abdul Subhan Qureshi, an Indian national who is believed to be behind many of the recent terror attacks inside India. Qureshi, a computer expert, is believed to have trained hundreds of recruits to conduct terror attacks in India. He is often called India’s Osama bin Laden.

Indian intelligence believes the Indian Mujahideen is a front group created by the Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Harkat ul Jihad al Islami. The Indian Mujahideen was created to confuse investigators and cover the tracks of the Students' Islamic Movement of India, or SIMI, a radical Islamist movement, according to Indian intelligence.

The Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Harkat ul Jihad al Islami receive support from Pakistan's Inter-Service Intelligence to destabilize India and wage war in Kashmir. Both of these terror groups are local al Qaeda affiliates in Pakistan and conduct attacks in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. The Indian “occupation” of Kashmir helped spawn these groups.

Reports indicate signals intelligence has linked the attackers back to Pakistan. Intelligence services are said to have intercepted the terrorists' conversations via satellite phone. The men spoke in Punjabi and used Pakistani phrases.

Indian politicians have been quick to point the finger at Pakistan. Gujarat state Chief Minister Narendra Modi accused Pakistan of allowing terrorists to use its soil as a terror launchpad. Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh blamed terror groups backed by India's "neighbors," a reference to Pakistan. Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee said "elements in Pakistan" were behind the Mumbai attacks.

A unique attack

The Mumbai attack differs from previous terror attacks launched by Islamic terror groups. Al Qaeda and other terror groups have not used multiple assault teams to attack multiple targets simultaneously in a major city outside of a war zone.

Al Qaeda and allied groups have conducted complex military assaults on military and non-military targets in countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Somalia, Algeria, and Pakistan. But these are countries that are actively in a state of war or emerging from a recent war, where resources and established fighting units already exist.

Al Qaeda has also used the combination of a suicide attack to breach an outer wall followed by one or more assault teams on military bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, as well as at the US embassy in Yemen. But again, these attacks are focused on a single target, and again occur where the resources and manpower is available.

Previous terror attacks in non-war zone countries such as India, London, Spain, the United States, Jordan, Morocco, and Egypt have consisted of suicide or conventional bombings on one or more critical soft targets such as hotels, resorts, cafes, rail stations, trains, and in the case of the Sept. 11 attack, planes used as suicide bombs.

The only attack similar to the Mumbai strike is the assault on the Indian Parliament by the Jaish-e-Mohammed, aided by the Lashkar-e-Taiba, in December 2001. A team of Jaish-e-Mohammed fighters attempted to storm the parliament building while in a session was held. A combination of mishaps by the terrorists and the quick reaction of security guards blunted the attack.

The Mumbai attack is something different. Foreign assault teams that likely trained and originated from outside the country infiltrated a major city to conduct multiple attacks on carefully chosen targets. The primary weapon was the gunman, not the suicide bomber. The attack itself has paralyzed a city of 18 million. And two days after the attack began, Indian forces are still working to root out the terror teams.
__________________
You can kill the man but never the idea that fuels the man's thirst of vengence...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #3 (permalink)  
Old 12-01-2008, 01:05 PM
Macaveli's Avatar
Macaveli Macaveli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sarasota, FL
Posts: 361
Rep Power: 0
Macaveli is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Great post Draven. It is clearly a given now that terrorist's are using tactical moves in an attempt to induce more terror upon the world. You know my wishes go out to those that lost their family members in that attack, especially that baby that lost his 2 parents, but we actually needed this. We needed this so the whole world can see what scum these people are and why we are at war with these individuals.

It is even more important now because we see that they are using more advanced techniques and movements. It is clear the world as a whole needs to ban together and get rid of these jihad infidels.

Also, it is clearly stupid of the media to even announce who claimed responsibility. Why boost their ego anymore than it is already? That is one of their goal's; to grab national spotlight. Well, we need to stop feeding into their ploy's, label them simply as terrorist's and not any one group, and continue the (unofficial war on terrorism).

It is just so funny how they throw that "they killed muslim's" excuse out there. Yeah, we did kill muslim's: muslim's that were planning terror attacks. So that right their prove's how idiotic and unstable these people are, where they believe it is ok to kill hundreds or thousands of innocent people because of their belief's but if we kill them because they plan on doing such thing's we are wrong.
__________________
Bombshockian Since Oct' 2001

Last edited by Macaveli; 12-01-2008 at 01:11 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2008, 05:36 PM
Draven's Avatar
Draven Draven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 0
Draven is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Well Ironically, this proves my point in another thread that a small guerrilla force could in fact do serious damage to a regular state forces. Had these nut jobs not killed innocent people I wouldn't have give a shit one way or the other. I would just write attacking government officals off as guerrilla warfare.

Still as much as I feel for those who died, I do respect the terrorist. Not for what they did but for there willingness to fight & die for a cause; even it is stupid. And, respecting them as such, I would be most honored to help them frind a respectable death...
__________________
You can kill the man but never the idea that fuels the man's thirst of vengence...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #5 (permalink)  
Old 12-02-2008, 09:50 PM
bloodlusta's Avatar
bloodlusta bloodlusta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: 100% US owned and operated NZ
Posts: 799
Rep Power: 0
bloodlusta is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Terrorism is the scourge of the 21th century. All i can promise you is that more attacks will be coming and it will take the next 100 years to finally beat them.

However you can see it from the side of the terrorist. They would see little difference in the US bombings of Iraq and twin towers going down. Or the US killing civilians in Afghanistan and what they have done in India.

The scary thing about terrorism is that there is no real 'front line', they can strike any place at any time. And these attacks just proved it.

Very good post Draven, keep the good stuff coming.
__________________
Si vis pacem, para bellum
If you seek peace, prepare for war
AntiCapitalism is a great way to sell a t-shirt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:37 AM
Draven's Avatar
Draven Draven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 444
Rep Power: 0
Draven is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodlusta View Post
Terrorism is the scourge of the 21th century. All i can promise you is that more attacks will be coming and it will take the next 100 years to finally beat them.

However you can see it from the side of the terrorist. They would see little difference in the US bombings of Iraq and twin towers going down. Or the US killing civilians in Afghanistan and what they have done in India.

The scary thing about terrorism is that there is no real 'front line', they can strike any place at any time. And these attacks just proved it.

Very good post Draven, keep the good stuff coming.
I try and much like your sug woulf inter, we (the none military/LEO population) are gonna need to start protecting ourselves more. May be terrorism isn't such a scourge after all if it makes us stronger...
__________________
You can kill the man but never the idea that fuels the man's thirst of vengence...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #7 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2008, 06:20 PM
Shepherd Shepherd is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
Shepherd is on a distinguished road
Default

Draven,

Excellent post and analysis. It looks like you hit several of the points right on. Have you looked at the new data, i.e.: that the response teams used the wrong analog in their response? They apparently were using the old hostage response scenario, in that they assumed that the hostage takers were immobile, and that the bad guys were interested in negotiating for the release of the hostages. In reality, the bad guys planned on killing the hostages and becoming mobile shooters. This will throw the normal response teams (think SWAT teams) reactions off. The SWAT are looking for one quick confrontation from the bad guys, not the long drawn-out gun battle that they ended up with.

It will be interesting to see your interpretation of the latest news from India and Pakistan. Keep up the good work!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #8 (permalink)  
Old 12-29-2008, 04:17 PM
CyberWar CyberWar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 342
Rep Power: 5
CyberWar is on a distinguished road
Default

In such scenario, I believe an indiscriminate attack would have done more good - if the invasion teams would have struck regardless to civilian casualties, it would probably have brought the combat to quick and messy end, sacrificing a few civilians to prevent the terrorists from moving around and killing more. If such tactic was used, I believe civilian casualties would number only around 50, not near the 200.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2008, 08:28 AM
User3rror's Avatar
User3rror User3rror is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Cali, USA.
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 0
User3rror is on a distinguished road
Default

CW is right, but a mere 50 casualties wouldn't have gained the response that the globalists wanted. The people behind both sides(the evil ones) wanted a revenge response, and not even 200 casualties brought that effect. The US did such a fine job with 911 compared to whatever intelligence agencies ran the mumbai terror attacks. It was probably ISI or MI6, and it was probably so botched up because MI6 was involved. Any way, they probably would've gotten a revenge response if they would've shown footage of the actual attacks, terrorists killing people, absolutely graphic yes, but that's the point. But if they did there's also the possibility that the footage would be used to show that it was indeed an inside job. Its not like it matters anymore, that's what everyone except the mainstream media is saying, that its an inside job with ISI and MI6.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36