Quote:
Originally Posted by FerretBone Todays mission must be so they can plant "evidence" on the moon. |
Sounds plausible. But when we find little wooden sandal prints made by the North Koreans a few months ago, we won't be the ones laughing then.
Jokes aside, a vast majority of the arguments I've seen in opposition to the validity of the original landing on the moon have been hearsay and just total garbage. Saying things that sound believable, but without much if any evidence behind them. A lot of it comes down to: "This old guy worked for NASA and told our website that he was there, and they faked it."
Of course, the debunkers often sound like that too.
It's like a game of tennis, opening two browser tabs, having a conspiracy theorist's website open in one, and the debunker's in another. Back and forth, in the end, the one debunking generally is the one that sounds like less of an idiot.
I think we landed on the moon, if someone gave me some hard evidence to the contrary, I would shrug, say, "cool", and continue on sipping my Dr. Pepper.