|
Bombshock Forums Archive www.bombshock.com If you cant find what you are looking for here then try our information archives or forums. click here to go to them! - / Electronic Devices / problems with my NV goggles |
|
-- Posted by Hergor on 11:18 am on Feb. 18, 2002
does anyone know what exactly happens when an over-ammount of light enters the image intensifier tube of NV devices?
-- Posted by OzzY on 3:00 pm on Feb. 18, 2002
take a baseball bat and take a small "visit" to your friend.. feel fine?!
-- Posted by Hergor on 6:00 pm on Feb. 18, 2002
-- Posted by Zambosan on 11:10 am on Feb. 19, 2002
Hergor,
-- Posted by Hergor on 11:23 am on Feb. 19, 2002
thanks for the info.
-- Posted by qube on 6:02 pm on Feb. 19, 2002
How much are night-vision goggles? I saw sum in Argos for £20 but they were just a pair on glasses with a torch attatched on them.....
-- Posted by Hergor on 10:35 am on Feb. 20, 2002
mine are worn-out russian military NV goggles. i got them from an unofficial market in 'stetin' (near the border from germany to poland). they did cost me about 80 euros (at that time 160 german marks).
-- Posted by balor on 3:14 pm on Feb. 20, 2002 No offence Qube but I would rather trust Zambosans diagnosis of the problem as he has a scientific background and knows what he is talking about.I mean really £20 at Argos.LOL
-- Posted by qube on 6:36 pm on Feb. 20, 2002
Yes, i never doubted his diagnosis, just confirmed it. Haha, and that was a joke abotu the shitty Argos goggles....hehe what peice of shit!
-- Posted by Zambosan on 10:15 am on Feb. 21, 2002 Hergor, given that it only flashes from time to time, it sounds as if the damage isn't as extensive. There's obviously been some damage in the microchannel layer, but it's only fused a small bit of the semiconductor. The effect is a lowered threshold voltage, which is why that portion of the device "flickers" on even in the absence of any meaningful signal. But if it had been completely melted, it would conduct all the time, resulting in a persistent patch of white on your display... which would probably also "burn" the phosphor like an old monochrome monitor.
-- Posted by Hergor on 12:07 pm on Feb. 21, 2002
well, luckily the damage isn't that hard.
-- Posted by Zambosan on 12:20 pm on Feb. 21, 2002 Because of the structure of the microchannel layer, I don't believe the damage can spread; the electrons will want to follow the path of least resistance to the positive terminal, so they shouldn't affect neighboring areas. However, the same principle *may* cause charge carriers from neighboring areas on the substrate to flow towards the damaged area, resulting in reduced sensitivity to images in the surrounding region... you may or may not notice this as increased darkness around the bright spot. The layer of nerves that covers your retina actually produces this effect in your eye; if a rod or cone cell stimulates a retinal nerve to fire, the output of that nerve cell will feed a subtractive input to its immediate neigbors, effectively raising its firing threshold. The result is a point spreading function (the 2-D equivalent of an impulse response in a one-dimensional filter) that looks like a peak with a shallower valley around it, kind of like a Daubechies wavelet. The result in your vision is that edges are enhanced, allowing the pattern-recognition circuitry in your brain to identify separate objects more easily, even when the edges are rounded and gradual. So you may not even notice this secondary effect of the damage to the photomultiplier, since your eye is already attenuating the signal in the area around the bright spot when you're viewing it.
-- Posted by Hergor on 1:45 pm on Feb. 21, 2002
thanks
|